Minutes of the Work Session held January 11, 2010 at 6:00
p.m. in the Council Chambers.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Mayor Lopez-Rogers and Council Members Jim
McDonald, Vice Mayor
Jim
Buster
Stephanie
Karlin
Frank
Scott
Charles
Vierhout
Ken
Weise
ALSO PRESENT
Charlie McClendon, City Manager
Andrew McGuire, City Attorney
Wayne Janis, Water Resources Director
Carmen Martinez, City Clerk
1) ROLL CALL BY
THE CITY CLERK
2) PRESENTATION OF PRELIMINARY
RESULTS - CITY OF AVONDALE WATER RESOURCE MASTER PLAN STUDY
City Council received a
summary of the preliminary results from the new Water Master Plan.
Mr. McClendon noted that the City of
Avondale has been working with consultant Malcolm Pirnie on the Water
Resources Master Plan (WRMP). Mr. Janis reported that Avondale has good water
resources into the near future. The WRMP has been substantially developed, and
should be complete by the middle of April. The project objectives are to:
·
Update the
previous master plan.
·
Analyze water
demands and compare them to supply.
·
Determine
whether to choose between wells, a surface water treatment plant, or a
combination of both.
·
Develop an
operations budget, and capital budgets for replacement and growth for the next
ten years.
Land use is being driven by the WRMP
among other plans. Avondale is divided into on-project and off-project areas.
On-project areas are entitled to water from the Salt River Project (SRP), while
off-project areas are not. On-project areas are generally east of the Agua Fria River. The SRP water often contains substantial amounts of Central Arizona
Project (CAP) water, or ground water. Avondale has more supply than demand for
both the on-project and off-project areas. This would allow for supplies with
excess to make up for those that experience shortages. Regardless of what
happens with growth, or water rights, Avondale is largely assured that its
water supplies will be sufficient through build out.
Mr. Janis examined water supply
alternatives. The wells tend to be located east of Dysart Road, and west of
the river. More wells could be built around the recharge facility on McDowell Road and the areas north of Buckeye Road. In areas south of Buckeye Road, the
dissolved solids are so high that it would not be practical to use that water.
A membrane treatment plant would cost too much, and would not get rid of the
brine. A surface water treatment plant is an alternative for the future, but
is not being recommended as the first supply.
The least expensive option is to
develop wells, and they will be an integral part of the City's future supply.
Avondale benefits from its ability to recharge reclaimed water. The
reclamation center recharges the aquifer using water with low total dissolved
solids. Treatment costs for this type of water are low. Recharge water is
considered direct use water is a highly valued component in the 100 year
assured water supply, but it is uncertain whether DWR will continue to consider
recharge water as direct use water. Avondale is in good shape with respect to
legal water rights as well as wet water since Avondale is located downhill on
the aquifer, and would be among the last locales to run out of water.
Wells are cost effective to
develop. It costs about $2 million to drill a well site and equip it, and they
can produce 1,200 gallons a minute. On the other hand, it would cost between
$80 million and $100 million for the first 7 million gallons of water produced
by a treatment plant. No special expertise is needed for wells. They are
resistant to water shortages, and can be monitored for changes in quality and
volume. Hydrologists estimate that even if Avondale pumps heavily, the aquifer
would not drop more than nine feet in 50 years. Potential difficulties
associated with wells include finding new sites, and having to treat for
arsenic and nitrates. Staff is looking at the possibility of rehabilitating
and reengineering those wells that have shown to have arsenic and nitrates to
produce a cleaner water supply even if volume decreases slightly.
A water treatment plant would have
the advantage of creating a large supply in one place. Operations costs can be
lower. It would not be as exposed to various neighborhoods. Avondale would
benefit from being able to recharge more water than currently permitted since
there would be more room for recharge if the water is recovered with wells and
this would further separate Avondale?s water from the Goodyear contamination
plume. He added that at this time the models indicate there is no risk that
the contamination from the Goodyear contamination plume will reach Avondale. The
disadvantages of a plant include the large capital outlay, possible changes in
canal water, disinfectant bi-products, and the lengthy process required to bring
a plant online.
Mr. Janis said Staff recommends that
Avondale continue to develop wells, focusing on the areas that would produce
the best quality water without requiring treatment. Wells can be developed on
an as-needed basis to match growth. It takes about two years to bring a well
online. The next steps are to determine operating costs, capital replacement,
and capital growth needs in order to come up with a budget. City Council could
also decide to set aside land for a future water treatment plant as a backup
plan.
Council Member Buster inquired about
the arsenic levels in the wells around the city, and what is being done to meet
Federal standards. Mr. Janis responded most of them are in the teens except
for one that has arsenic levels in the forties and was taken off line. Wells 6
and 7 are being treated to reduce levels to less than eight parts per million.
Council Member Buster inquired about the cost of that effort. Mr. Janis
responded that he would return with an accurate figure. Mr. Janis clarified
that the City's remaining wells all meet Federal arsenic standards. Council
Member Buster queried what would occur should another well come on line that
exceeded Federal arsenic standards.
Council Member Buster inquired about
the advantage that a surface water treatment plant would provide in achieving
future assured water supply designations. Mr. Janis explained that the City
has to demonstrate that it has enough wet water and legal water to supply the
customers in its service area for the next 100 years. The Department of Water
Resources may not consider water that is recharged away from the community as
being as readily available as water that is recharged within the community. If
Avondale cannot increase its recharge capability at the McDowell Road basins,
it may have to reevaluate a surface water treatment plant in order to assure a
100-year supply.
David Fitzhugh, Assistant City
Manager clarified that there are two wells in the northern part of the city
that currently exceed Federal arsenic standards; the water is being sent
through the water treatment facility to reduce levels. Mr. Janis added that
the water can be blended, sent through the existing treatment facility, or the
well could be redesigned to screen out the parts of the aquifer that are
contributing excess arsenic.
Council Member Karlin noted that the
western U.S. has naturally occurring levels of arsenic, and Federal legislators
should be aware of this so as not to penalize these communities. She inquired
how much water Avondale would have at build out. Mr. Janis responded that the
City at that point would require a well capacity of about 38 million gallons.
If Avondale continues to recharge the water that it uses, and neighbors do not
affect the aquifer, there would be no depletion, and the future would be very
sustainable. Council Member Karlin said Avondale might have to plan for a
water treatment plant and inquired whether Avondale has considered setting
aside land for this purpose. Mr. Janis responded that there is room available
to build a water treatment plant adjacent to the recharge basins. The area
around 107th Avenue and Roosevelt Street would also make a good
location, if land could be reserved there.
Council Member Karlin proposed
designating land for that purpose, even if it were not purchased at this time.
Mr. McClendon said if the General Plan designated this land for use for public
facilities, it would preclude other uses. He prefers designating it under a
different category so as not to tie it up. Mr. Janis noted that Scottsdale successfully located a water treatment facility under a City park. There is no
need to act now on a plant. This simply exists as an option for future
consideration.
In response to an inquiry from
Council Member Weise, Mr. Janis said the arsenic in wells 6 and 7 is naturally
occurring. Treatment has been a cost effective solution. Council Member Weise
inquired about the possibility that the plume from Goodyear could migrate
towards Avondale's wells. Mr. Janis responded that the consultants indicate
that the groundwater plume is not expected to be a problem. The recharge
basins will tend to push away any bad water from getting near Avondale's best
wells. Council Member Weise queried about how decisions made by the Department
of Water Resources could affect Avondale. Mr. Janis said the worst-case
scenario sees the City having to build a water treatment plant and using water
there instead of recharging the aquifer.
Council Member Scott asked about the
City's best wells. Mr. Janis said the best water comes from well 18 and those
around it.
Mayor Lopez-Rogers inquired how
Avondale is affected by the Liberty Water Company not recharging water in Litchfield Park. Mr. Janis said he suspects it would not make a big difference, and no
rapid drops have been noticed. Vice Mayor McDonald inquired about the success
of Crystal Gardens experiment in cleaning up and recharging water. Mr. Janis
responded that it successfully takes nitrates out of the water. It should result
in less equipment being required should a water treatment plant ever be built
nearby. In response to a further inquiry from Vice Mayor McDonald, Mr. Janis
said the City is looking into the history of the limitations for recharging
groundwater and whether anything could be done to increase the capacity to
recharge more.
3) ADJOURNMENT
With no
further business before the Council, Council Member Weise moved to adjourn the
work session. Council Member Scott seconded the motion. The motion carried
unanimously.
Meeting adjourned at 6:43 p.m.