Minutes
of the Regular Meeting held March 17, 2008 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Mayor Lopez Rogers and Council
Members Ken Weise, Vice Mayor
Jim
Buster
Frank
Scott
Stephanie
Karlin
Jim
McDonald
Chuck
Wolf
ALSO
PRESENT
Charlie
McClendon, City Manager
Andrew
McGuire, City Attorney
Richard
T. Lynch, City Judge
Gina
Montes, Neighborhood & Family Services Director
Pam
Altounian, Code Compliance Manager, Neighborhood & Family Services Dept.
Shirley Gunther,
Intergovernmental Affairs Manager
John
Vater, Planner I, Development Services Department
Dave
Fitzhugh, Assistant City Manager
Kelly La Rosa, Traffic
Engineering Department
Scott
Wilken, Senior Planner, Development Services Department
Eric
Morgan, Planner II, Development Services
Linda
Farris, City Clerk
Mayor Lopez-Rogers called the
meeting to order and led those present in the Pledge of Allegiance and a moment
of reflection.
1) STATEMENT
OF PARTICIPATION BY THE CITY CLERK
2) CITY
MANAGER’S REPORT
a.
Recognition of eight City employees who recently graduated from the Arizona State University Certified Public Manager Program.
The
following City employees were recognized for completing the Arizona State
University Certified Public Manager Program: Pam Altounian, Code Compliance
Manager, Neighborhood & Family Services Department; Tony Ayala, Operation
& Service Manager, Water Resources Department; Ron Dennis, Assistant Fire
Chief; Janeen Gaskins, Grants Administrator, City Administration; Javier
Machuca, Solid Waster Supervisor, Field Operations; Carmen Martinez, Deputy City
Clerk; Pier Simeri, Community Relations & Public Affairs Department
Director; and Lari Spire, GIS Manager, Water Resources Department.
Mayor Lopez
Rogers stated she was very proud of the Avondale employees and she thanked the employees
for going through the program.
3) UNSCHEDULED PUBLIC
APPEARANCES
Michael
Barbetta, City resident and business owner, told the Council that he calls the
graffiti hotline every single day, and then calls Pam Altounian, Code
Compliance Manager, and Sammi Curless, Assistant to the Mayor and Council, as
well as others, and finds that it is similar to yelling in a black hole. His
big area of concern is on lower Dysart Road between Van Buren and Buckeye Road where the businesses have been inundated with graffiti. He reported that approximately
three weeks ago there were over 35 graffiti markings on that one stretch of
road. Mr. Barbetta stated the only time the business owners had satisfaction
was when he called and left messages that Channel 10 was interested in coming
out and doing a piece on the explosion of graffiti. He reported it takes three
to four weeks for the graffiti to be removed and it is even on some of the palm
trees. He shared that when they call the City of Goodyear, within 48 hours the
graffiti is usually gone. Mr. Barbetta stated the City of Avondale does not
return his calls anymore and he feels like he is an irritation to the City. As
a result, he has moved his auto wholesaling business out of Avondale, and he is
in the process of selling his home and moving his consulting business out of
Avondale, because if Avondale does not care, then he does not care.
Lisa Amos, 12425 W. Apache St., Avondale, AZ, stated she has spoken with Vice Mayor Weise several times
and Council Member Scott has left her a message. The graffiti is a concern of
hers and she has proposed by letter to various Staff some ideas that she hopes
the City will consider. She believes that businesses need to be educated that
they can paint the graffiti over and they need to know what graffiti is about
and how it is blight to the City. She stated in the business and HOA summits
the businesses can be educated that they have to get on the graffiti quickly.
Ms. Amos stated the graffiti hotline is great in concept, but it is only one
part-time person, and if it not going to be fully staffed, maybe the City
should not have it until the calls can be responded to in a timely fashion.
She encouraged in her letter that new businesses, particularly on Avondale Blvd., become volunteers and participate in graffiti removal. She reported that a couple
of her neighbors have moved because of quality of life issues, and stated that
before all the new development comes in, the City needs to keep control of the
developments that already exist.
Mayor Lopez
Rogers asked Charlie McClendon, City Manager, to address the graffiti issues.
4) CONSENT AGENDA
Items on the
Consent Agenda are of a routine nature or have been previously studied by the
City Council at a Work Session. They are intended to be acted upon in one
motion. Council Members may pull items from consent if they would like them
considered separately.
a. APPROVAL OF
MINUTES
●
Regular meeting of March 3, 2008
●
Work Session of March 3, 2008
b.
APPROVAL OF CLAIMS – JANUARY AND FEBRUARY 2008
c. APPROVAL
OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT FOR JUDGE RICHARD T. LYNCH
Employment
Agreement for Mr. Richard T. Lynch for a two-year appointment as City Judge.
d. AWARD A CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACT TO BLUCOR CONTRACTING, INC. FOR THE CDBG STREET & SIDEWALK
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Construction
contract to Blucor Contracting, Inc. for the CDBG Street and Sidewalk
Improvement Project in the amount of $1,695,000, authorization to transfer
$429,368 from Street Fund Line Item No. 304-1009-00-8420 (Citywide Street
Enhancement) to Street Fund Line Item No. 304-1162-00-8420 (CDBG Street and
Sidewalk Improvements), $300,000 from Water Fund Line Item No. 514-1057-00-8520
(Garden Lakes Improvements) to Water Fund Line Item No. 514-1162-00-8520 (CDBG
Water Improvements), $400,000 from Water Fund Line Item No. 514-1058-00-8520
(South Avondale Improvements) to Water Fund Line Item No. 514-1162-00-8520
(CDBG Water Improvements), and $60,632 (in FY 08-09) from Water Fund Line Item
No. 514-1058-00-8520 (South Avondale Improvements) to Water Fund Line Item No.
514-1162-00-8520 (CDBG Water Improvements), and authorizing the Mayor, or City
Manager and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents.
e. AWARD A CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACT TO BRIZCO CONSTRUCTION, LLC FOR THE VAN BUREN STREET 16-INCH
TRANSMISSION LINE
Construction
contract to Brizco Construction, LLC for waterline and other improvements for Van Buren Street, in the amount of $324,940.99, and authorize the Mayor, or City Manager and
City Clerk to execute the necessary documents.
f.
RIVERA MINOR LAND DIVISION ML-07-11
Request to
subdivide a 0.46 acre parcel into two lots. Lot 1 will be 11,578 square feet; Lot 2 will be 11,580 square feet. In addition to creating these two lots, the applicant is
dedicating 30 feet of right-of-way on 124th Avenue to the City.
g. LETTER
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH EMPIRE AT COLDWATER SPRINGS, LLC
Letter Agreement
between the City of Avondale and Empire at Coldwater Springs, LLC relating to
street, traffic signal and median landscaping improvements cost sharing,
approve the transfer of funds from Street Fund Line No. 304-1009-00-8420 to
Street Fund Line No. 304-1257-00-8420, and authorize the Mayor, or City Manager
and City Clerk to execute the agreement.
h. RESOLUTION
2722-208 AUTHORIZING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH MARICOPA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
Resolution
authorizing an Intergovernmental Agreement with Maricopa County Department of
Public Health relating to the childhood immunization program.
i. RESOLUTION
2731-308 APPROVING A PRE-ANNEXATION AGREEMENT AND ORDINANCE 1298-308 ACCEPTING
RIGHT-OF-WAY
Resolution
approving a Pre-Annexation Agreement with Mr. and Mrs. Verville and an
ordinance accepting the dedication of right-of-way from Mr. and Mrs. Verville,
and authorize the Mayor, or City Manager and City Clerk to execute the
necessary documents.
j.
ORDINANCE 1292-308 – DIAMOND P RANCH ANNEXATION
Ordinance
annexing 244 acres of land generally located south of Lower Buckeye Road
between Avondale Blvd. and El Mirage Road. The Council will take appropriate
action.
k. ORDINANCE
AUTHORIZING ACQUISITION OF WELLSITE 22 FROM THE EMPIRE CENTER AT COLDWATER
SPRINGS, LLC
Ordinance
authorizing the acquisition of Wellsite 22 at the Coldwater Springs Promenade
Development for $24,892.30.
Andrew McGuire,
City Attorney, noted that the Council had received a document including an
exhibit with the accompanying text on Item G, Letter Reimbursement Agreement
with Empire at Coldwater Springs, LLC. He read the resolutions and ordinances
by title only. Council Member Wolf moved to approve the Consent Agenda,
including the resolutions and ordinances. Council Member Scott seconded the
motion.
Mayor Lopez Rogers
invited further discussion, and hearing none, called for a vote.
ROLL
CALL VOTE AS FOLLOWS:
Council
Member Scott Aye
Council
Member Buster Aye
Mayor
Lopez-Rogers Aye
Vice
Mayor Weise Aye
Council
Member Wolf Aye
Council
Member Karlin Aye
Council
Member McDonald Aye
Motion carried
unanimously.
5) INSTALLATION OF
JUDGE LYNCH
Mayor Rogers
administered the oath of office to Judge Richard Lynch.
6) UPDATE
ON PROACTIVE CODE ENFORCEMENT EFFORTS
Gina Montes,
Neighborhood & Family Services Director, informed the Council that upcoming
revitalization activities will include Staff bringing the CDBG Annual Action Plan
for Council’s approval, which is currently in the 30 day comment period. She
stated a new item of the plan is a storefront renovation pilot program on Western Avenue with $120,000.00 set aside for improvements of the storefronts, which will be
coordinated by the Economic Development Department, and a match will be
required. Housing Rehab and Acquisition Rehab Programs will include looking at
homes that are in foreclosure or vacant in order to use those resources where
most needed. A Weed and Seed Community Coalition is being convened in an
attempt to obtain a grant, which would be used to weed out crime and seed good
things in the community.
Ms. Montes reported
that the part-time graffiti person has been made full-time effective last week.
She talked about the implementation of an “Eyes & Ears Program” where City
employees are given forms with their paychecks so they can note where graffiti
and other Code Enforcement issues need to be addressed. She stated that her
department had also implemented A Community volunteer program. She stated that
the Code Division staff are enforcing requirements for graffiti implements to
be locked up and are working with businesses and HOAs to take responsibility
for their properties. She pointed out that the City cannot paint over private
property without the property owner’s permission, and that the current Code
allows businesses 30 days to paint over graffiti. Ms. Montes stated that staff
will be asking Council to reduce that amount of time to 10 days. She stated
that Staff is not sure why there has been an increase in graffiti, but they are
certainly trying to address it as best they can.
Mayor Lopez
Rogers invited questions and comments.
Vice Mayor Weise
remarked that to say graffiti has increased is an understatement, and part of
the problem is stores, such as Home Depot, are still not locking up their spray
paint cans. He stated it would be really nice to work with Home Depot to provide
one gallon of color matching paint to citizens to paint over graffiti. He stated
that the City does not have enough graffiti abatement staff, and despite the
economic times, more help is needed. He also suggested stiffening the fines
for graffiti offenders.
Council Member Buster
asked why there is an increase in the graffiti and who the offenders were.
Avondale Police Chief Kotsur reported there has been an influx of graffiti
reports to the Police Department and he would report back to the Council with
assessments on where it is coming from. He stated it is a misnomer that all
graffiti is gang related, in that a lot of it is tagging, but a lot is simply a
matter of artwork in some peoples’ minds.
Council Member Wolf
stated he is very concerned about Code Enforcement capabilities on private
property. He would like to see what the Council can do from a staffing perspective
and how to proactively respond to graffiti. He stated 10 days to remove graffiti
is still too long and suggested 48 to 72 hours, with a provision for new
developments stating that the City can take a proactive measurement if the
business does not respond in a timely fashion.
Council Member
Karlin agreed that graffiti sends a bad message, especially in terms of the
investment in economic development, and she agrees that 48 hours to cover graffiti
is something the City should strive for.
Vice Mayor Weise
stated he likes the idea of the volunteer program, and the Council Members
should be out there as well. He suggested a letter or form be sent to
commercial water customers stating that by signing the document, the customer
allows the City to come on their property to remove the graffiti if the
graffiti is not removed within a certain amount of time. He asked Staff to let
the Council know what tools they need.
Mayor Lopez
Rogers stated graffiti is sometimes a social issue, and with the economy in a
downturn, it is common to see more. She stated there needs to be input from the
Youth Commission and a targeted focus on graffiti. She reported the KEYS
Program has leaders that were once graffiti offenders and suggested asking them
about the increase in graffiti, as well as educating the schools and churches,
and using Code Enforcement fines. She stated she is sick of graffiti and it must
be stopped.
Pam Altounian,
Code Compliance Manager, Neighborhood & Family Services Department, gave
background information on the Code Enforcement Division, stating that they
enforce the International Property Maintenance Code, support the Zoning
Ordinance, and partner with other City Departments, the Avondale City Courts, Maricopa County neighboring communities, Union Pacific Railroad and ADOT. Since July 2007
Code Enforcement has had 3,274 cases, and 182 civil citations have been issued,
which resulted in 96 court hearings. 64 cases were dismissed. One percent of the
total cases have gone to court over the last three years and over $19,000.00 in
civil fines have been assessed. She reported that over 1,000 graffiti sites
have been taken care of while the Staff member was part time, and now at full
time there is a tremendous difference. Code Enforcement Officers will be going
to Cashion on March 20, 2008 to help with graffiti removal. She informed the Council
that graffiti is considered defacement of property under the International Property
Maintenance Code (IPMC) and is handled as a civil citation, and once the time
is shortened and a citation is issued, it is very effective. Ms. Altounian reported
over 3,200 illegal signs have been removed, and that the problem with
grass/weeds and inoperable vehicles has dropped quite a bit.
Ms. Altounian
stated a task force will be put together regarding Western Avenue and preliminary
work done to develop a comprehensive plan to bring Western Avenue back to
vitality. Areas covered will include sanitation, building structures, fire-rescue,
zoning, design guidelines, business licenses, etc. She informed the Council
that the proposed Code Enforcement actions are: 1) Pre-inspection
notification, including an inspection checklist. 2) Initial inspection. 3)
Violation(s) identified verbally, by door hanger, or a notice of a violation.
4) Compliance actions with closure of the case or issuance of a civil citation.
Ms. Altounian stated the keys to success for the task force will include being
unified in the mission, having a plan of action, consistency in application,
offering time to comply within reason, and communication.
Ms. Altounian informed
the Council that the new program for Proactive Code Enforcement began in March
2008. She explained with this new program, the City will inspect the reported
parcel, as well as the properties on each side and directly across the street
to provide consistency in Code application. This will minimize frustration,
improve residential trust, provide visible improvement, and define expectations.
Ms. Altounian reported the proposed amendments will come before the Council on April 21, 2008 for approval. These amendments apply to IPMC Sections 1, 2, and 3. One amendment
is on the Notice of Abatement to separate the report of the cost of the City’s
abatement on a property from the fine in order to avoid confusion for the
citizen. Another amendment regards closing of vacant structures with an added
sentence that reads “Securing a vacant structure is a temporary option
permitted for a period not to exceed two years.” An amendment on parking
proposes the ordinance be removed and enforced through the Zoning Ordinance.
The graffiti amendment reduces the time period for graffiti abatement from 30
to 10 days. She commented that 48 to 72 hours for abatement is reasonable and
Staff will consider that.
Council Member Wolf
stated he would shorten the time period for graffiti abatement to two days. He
stated that vacant buildings being closed for two years is not temporary and
suggested reducing the time to perhaps six months.
Council Member Scott
stated cameras are a great tool and deterrent and lets the citizens know the City
cares about graffiti. He stated the volunteer program is a good program. Council
Member Scott would like to convene a group of stakeholders from Western Avenue to obtain their input before giving out money from a block grant. Then a
committee could decide where the grant money will go. Regarding Western Avenue, he stated the businesses owe the City a partnership. He stated over
$100,000.00 was spent on the revitalization plan and now he sees holes in
buildings, and proactive code enforcement will send the message that the City
is serious. Council Member Scott pointed out trailer park ordinances should be
addressed.
Vice Mayor Weise
agreed with Council Member Wolf that vacant buildings should remain closed for
no longer than six months. He likes a time limit of 48 hours for graffiti
removal. He asked if Staff was still doing sweeps of residential neighborhoods
and with a focus on Western Avenue, what about the residential neighborhoods in
the northern part of the City. Ms. Altounian informed the Council that Staff has
again begun sweeps of residential neighborhoods. She stated they have just completed
a sweep of Westwind, and on Monday Staff will do a sweep of Los Arbolitos and
Pecan Groves, and the following Monday, Harbor Shores, and by the end of March,
Staff will have inspected 1,400 houses on top of approximately 400 complaints
received for the month. Vice Mayor Weise stated the out-of-town investors who
do not care about Avondale should be treated with a hammer to bring them into
compliance.
Council Member
Karlin recommended an award or sign in response to beautification efforts. Ms.
Altounian replied that thank you notes are sent to everyone who complies, and
Staff can look into other types of awards for compliance.
Mayor Lopez
Rogers stated the issue was critical to the Council and may be the only item to
talk about on a future agenda so there is more time.
7) ORDINANCE AMENDING AVONDALE CITY CODE CHAPTERS 15 AND 23
Shirley Gunther,
Intergovernmental Affairs Manager, explained the Maricopa County region is
required by the Clean Air Act (CAA) to have a plan in place to reduce the PM-10
admissions by at least 5 percent per year until the standard is obtained. To
be in attainment, the region needs three years of clean data. She reported the
City of Avondale has been a regional leader in programs regarding controlling
airborne dust pollutants, and the City has a deliberate process in annexation,
and therefore is able to pave and stabilize many of the roadways and alleys,
which leaves the City in a good place. She reported that two years ago the
City of Avondale passed an ordinance which required all of the street sweepers
to be PM-10 efficient.
Ms. Gunther
reported that to come into compliance with the EPA requirements, the Arizona
State Legislature passed SB 1522, which made substantial changes to the statute
pertaining to air quality control. Some of the provisions in SB 1522 require
municipalities to pass ordinances to achieve the PM-10 measures, which include
paving or stabilizing dirt roads, shoulders and alleyways, and banning the use
of leaf blowers and off-road vehicles. She stated that Section 1 of the ordinance
pertains to leaf blowers and states that it is unlawful to blow landscape
debris or dust into the public roadway. Section 1 also pertains to unpaved
areas and requires public and private parking lots, ingress and egress areas to
be paved or stabilized, and requires parking areas, ingress and egress areas of
3,000 square feet or more in size and residential buildings with four or fewer
units to be paved or stabilized. It also prohibits driving or parking on any
unpaved lot unless the lot is dust proof, and it prohibits off-road vehicles,
all-terrain vehicles, and off-road recreational motor vehicles from operation
on unpaved surfaces. The ordinance does allow some exception for vehicles on
unpaved areas in the normal use of business and government operations. As
well, the ordinance authorizes the City Manager as designee to enter in and inspect
property to ensure it is in compliance with the dust-proofing measures.
Staff recommends
that the City Council adopt an Ordinance amending the Avondale City Code Chapters
15 and 23 pertaining to dust control and abatement. Ms. Gunther pointed out
that Staff is performing public outreach through the City web site regarding
the requirements and providing dust control phone numbers.
Council Member Wolf
stated PM-10 is 10 microns or less and the issue is animating it in the first
place, and he cannot figure out how the Senate passed a bill that focuses on
pushing debris into the public right-of-way, when using a leaf blower on the
remainder of the property generates far more dust than putting it in the public
right-of-way so a car can hit it and not animate it as much as a leaf blower.
Therefore, he wonders about the applicability of the bill only applying to the
right-of-way. Ms. Gunther stated Council Member Buster had more insight on the
issue.
Council Member
Buster stated he worked a lot on this bill last year and reported that leaf
blowers were a small component of the overall PM-10 picture, but something that
certain people felt to be an important part in terms of noise and dust. In terms
of the prohibition of debris being blown out into the street, if the dust is
blown onto the street, it gets onto the pavement and gets entrained by tires
and then goes up into the air. He stated a big part of the PM-10 problem is
vehicles traveling down the roads and kicking up dust into the air. Council
Member Buster stated the only other restriction on leaf blowers was using them
on High Pollution Advisory days.
Council Member
Karlin commented that wood burning fireplaces contribute to the PM-10 and
suggested that a ban on wood burning fireplaces be added to the ordinance.
Council Member Buster
remarked that the fireplace issue is addressed in the bill and there are bans
on using them on High Pollution Advisory days. He stated the biggest reductions
in PM-10 come from the construction community with their dust control measurements.
He stated it is very important that the City move forward in order to continue
to receive Federal Highway Funds.
Council Member
Karlin asked how the ordinance would be enforced. Ms. Gunther replied that
Maricopa County will perform much of the dust control enforcement and they have
committed 23 million dollars to deal with the PM-10 issue, as well as they have
hired 91 employees to help with the enforcement of dust control.
Vice Mayor Weise
stated he sees this as a n unfunded Federal mandate on the cities to comply
with the regulation, and with the amount of effort that is required, especially
in the desert where a half a gallon of water is needed per square yard to keep
emissions down every day to bring the City into compliance, it is Federal government
at its worse. He thinks the rule is ridiculous and there has to be a better
way to mitigate the problem rather than putting the onus on the City,
especially when the State looks at taking away State-shared revenues from the
City in the future and taking money from the citizens’ pockets to mitigate a
State regulation, when that money could be used for other health issues that
are more important and more directly affect the residents.
Council Member Wolf
stated the Clean Air Act (CAA) came into existence because people were dying
and the City has done a lot of other things that have created the PM-10 issue
far beyond leaf blowers and dust stabilization, and the fact of the matter is
that the ways to address this problem are few and far between at this point in
time. He stated the CAA is not the issue, but rather the fact that no one wants
to address the issue until they are hit in the pocketbook. He reported that
research shows that clean air issues in Phoenix are not part and parcel to Phoenix, but travel to Tucson and other areas. As such, this is an interstate issue,
which is why the Federal government got involved with it. Council Member Wolf believes
the plan can be implemented at a relatively low cost and the Federal requirements
are not that challenging to achieve.
Andrew McGuire,
City Attorney, pointed out that with respect to no-burn days on High Pollution Advisory
days and the ban on leaf blowers on all non-stabilized surfaces, they are a
requirement for the County to implement. The cities and towns are required to
implement the ban on leaf blowers with respect to right-of-way and with City
contractors.
Mayor Lopez
Rogers asked to have the ordinance read.
Andrew McGuire,
City Attorney, read Ordinance 1293-308, by title only. Council Member Wolf
moved to adopt the ordinance. Council Member Scott seconded the motion.
Mayor Lopez
Rogers invited further discussion, and hearing none, called for a vote.
ROLL
CALL VOTE AS FOLLOWS:
Council
Member Scott Aye
Council
Member Buster Aye
Mayor
Lopez-Rogers Aye
Vice
Mayor Weise Aye
Council
Member Wolf Aye
Council
Member Karlin Aye
Council
Member McDonald Aye
Motion carried
unanimously.
8) AVONDALE
MARKETPLACE (DR-07-8) MASTER SITE PLAN AND PARCEL 2 FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL
John Vater, Planner I, Development Services Department, stated
this is application DR-07-8, a request for Master Site Plan approval for
Avondale Marketplace and Final Site Plan approval for five sites in Parcel 2 of
Avondale Marketplace. He described the 38.6 acre development as located at the
northwest corner of Avondale Blvd. and McDowell Road. He described the
surrounding properties as the Palm Gardens Development to the north, Donatela
Phase 1 to the east, the proposed Agua Fria Marketplace to the south, and an
APS substation to the west. Mr. Vater relayed that the site is designated as
Commercial in the General Plan and is zoned as Planned Area Development (PAD)
with Residential, Commercial, and Office Park uses. He described the surrounding
zoning as Neighborhood-Commercial to the east, Agricultural to the west, and
Planned Area Developments to the north and south.
Mr. Vater
outlined that the Master Site Plan encompasses three separate parcels, and
Parcel 2 is the retail portion of the development, consisting of 25.23 acres
with approximately 214,000 square feet of tenant space proposed. Parcel 3 is a
self-storage development of 4.6 acres, consisting of four buildings with
approximately 103,000 square feet of storage space. Parcel 4 is an 8.77 acre
office park consisting of 11 buildings with a combined 75,000 square feet of
tenant space. Access to the site will be provided by two driveways from Avondale Blvd. and six driveways from McDowell Road. Three full access driveways are proposed,
one at the entrance to the mini storage parcel, one at the signalized intersection
of McDowell Road and 116th Avenue, and one at the northern most driveway
on Avondale Blvd. Cross access is provided between the parcels, and each
parcel is served by a network of internal drives. Pedestrian access will be facilitated
from Avondale Blvd. and McDowell Road by tree-lined walkways, and a pedestrian
entry feature is included at the intersection of Avondale Blvd. and McDowell Road. Mr. Vater explained that based on the proposed uses for all the buildings,
the Master Site is required to have 1,183 parking spaces, and the applicant is
proposing a total of 1,273. All parcels are sufficiently sized and shaped to
allow for future development and onsite circulation.
Mr. Vater noted
that in addition to the Master Site Plan, the applicant is requesting approval
of the Final Site Plan for Parcel 2, the retail portion of the development.
Parcel 2 is proposed to be developed in phases. The first phase consists of
two major tenant spaces, B and E; Shops C; and two multi-tenant pads B and F,
with PAD F having a drive-through. The rest of Parcel 2 will be developed in
future phases, as well as Parcels 3 and 4, which will be administratively
approved. All off-site improvements, including roadway improvements, frontage landscaping,
power pole relocation and easements will be constructed during the initial
phase. The site is required to have 204,000 square feet of landscaping, and
the applicant is proposing approximately 208,000 feet. The development will
have a 25 foot landscape buffer along the northern property line to screen it
from the future residential phase, with the landscape buffer containing mostly
24 inch box trees planted 20 feet on center. Date palms will be used in the
medians of two driveways, at the pedestrian entry feature, and in front of the
major tenant buildings. Mr. Vater described the architecture as
contemporary-commercial, including varied roof lines, articulated facades,
decorative arches, cornice columns, scored stucco, and metal awnings. The
colors are earth tones on the walls and green for the metal roof features. The
materials are stucco, glass, masonry, slate, stone, wood, and metal. He showed
the Commission slides of the building elevations and features.
Mr. Vater told
the Council that Staff finds that the application meets the required findings.
The Planning Commission recommended approval on February 21, 2008 with 21 stipulations. Stipulation No. 15 was discussed in great detail and requires the
applicant to install a deceleration lane at the northeast most driveway off Avondale Blvd. As the applicant does not own the parcel where the deceleration lane would come
out, the Planning Commission tried to amend the stipulation to a right-out/left-in
only driveway. On further review, Staff prepared a preferred and amended
stipulation that establishes a right-out only driveway until such time that Avondale Blvd. is widened, and then the deceleration lane can be provided, and the driveway
can be constructed as a full access driveway. Mr. Vater reported that only one
letter has been received since the last Planning Commission meeting in
opposition to this project, which was from the adjoining property owner concerning
the right-of-way and the deceleration lane, as well as water rights.
Vice Mayor Weise
stated the planned entryway is excellent. He asked to discuss changing the 24
inch box trees to include a certain caliper on the trees. He stated the
variation in roof lines and stone features are great and asked if the colors
could be more vibrant to match the development across the street. Vice Mayor
Weise stated he is happy to have this project in Avondale.
Council Member
Wolf asked if the vacant parcel north of this site is part of the overall
development scheme. Mr. Vater replied that parcel is part of the PAD for this
project and is the residential portion which will be phased in after the retail
section. Council Member Wolf expressed concern that the 30 foot building
heights will be very imposing upon the residential district and he would
advocate a separation between Palm Gardens and this development. Council
Member Wolf echoed Vice Mayor Weise, in that he is not happy with the five
shades of beige and would like to see more color. While he would approve the
architectural layouts this evening, he thinks there should be more discussion
and perhaps a return to Council on the colors.
Regarding
Stipulation No. 15, Council Member Wolf asked about the driveway for this
development. Mr. Vater replied that a revised traffic study was submitted by
the applicant subsequent to the Planning Commission meeting; however, it reviewed
a right-out/left-in/right-in, which was not reflective of the Planning
Commission’s desire. The applicant then submitted another revised study reviewing
a right-out/left-in only per the Planning Commission’s recommendation.
Subsequent to that, through Staff review, Staff felt that the right-out option
was the best and safest option at this point. He stated the applicant has not
provided the revised traffic study, but that will be required as a condition of
approval. Council Member Wolf asked if the applicant was concerned that a
right-out only driveway would have a negative effect on traffic flow to the development,.
He stated he did not understand why a reconstruction of the entrance was
necessary if a right-out only is the only option needed. Mr. Vater replied
that the intent was to provide a full access driveway on Avondale Blvd. At
some point Avondale Blvd. will be widened, and the traffic study originally
warranted a full left-in/full right-out. Additionally, across the street at
the proposed Children’s Hospital, that will be the location for their full
turning movement driveway.
Council Member Wolf
inquired if there would be a traffic light. Charlie McClendon, City Manager,
replied that would remain to be seen as the traffic volumes there change.
Council Member Wolf
stated this appears based on warrant studies and traffic that are not accounted
for yet. He thinks a right-out/left-in is all the turning movements necessary,
and he does not see why a full turning movement is required at that location. Dave Fitzhugh, Assistant City Manager, replied that as the
area develops, the City is anticipating a use base coming from the north and
the model was set up to distribute the traffic to all the planned access
points. The traffic study analyzed the entire Site Plan inclusive of the
office, the Commercial and the Storage, and looking at how those trips were
distributed amongst all the driveways, they were adequate with the full access
on Avondale Blvd. and the limited access just south.
Council Member Wolf asked if the revised traffic study was
to have something on the books with a PE seal that states in the first phase a
right-out only will work and would that be on file. Mr. Fitzhugh stated that
is correct, that documentation will need to be on file, as there are about 170 northbound
to westbound left turns at that intersection predicted during the peak hour and
they need to see how those trips will be redistributed to the other access
points. Council Member Wolf asked if the City was taking responsibility for
reconstruction of the entrance at the time Avondale Blvd. is expanded, and
would the applicant be providing some of the money now to cover that cost. Mr.
Fitzhugh stated that is correct and it is a stipulation to collect those funds
for future expenditure.
Council Member McDonald asked if when Avondale Blvd. is
built out, will it be two lanes in each direction and a median to the point
where the entrance is. He expressed concern that it appears it will be a blind
turn out. Mr. Vater replied that the road will be designed to have both
southbound movements and a widening deceleration lane starting at some point
north, with sight visibility and the ability for people southbound to see that
that driveway is coming up. He informed the Council that the revised traffic
study provided by the applicant showed the right turn movement was safe in this
existing situation.
Kelly La Rosa,
Traffic Engineering Department, added that the traffic study does not
specifically address sight visibility unless the client requests that for
landscaping, and that is taken care of at the Civil Site Plan stage. She
reported that Staff would look at the design of the driveway in terms of sight
visibility to the extent that they can, but because of the issue with private
property, there are legal restrictions as far as going onto private property
and clearing trees. Ms. La Rosa assured the Council that Staff would consider
everything to make sure the driveway is designed as safe as possible.
Mayor Lopez
Rogers invited further questions and comments from Council and heard none.
Peter
Valenzuela, 2425 E. Camelback Rd., Ste. 950, Phoenix, AZ, representing Troast
Properties, stated his client was very happy to be in the City of Avondale. He stated they are willing to discuss the color schemes and 24 inch box trees.
He reported that his client has been in the Site Approval process for about 18
months and has gone through three Site Plan submittals, and with the last Site
Plan there were a number of comments concerning the traffic. He stated regarding
Stipulation No. 15, his client has bent over backwards and would like to move
forward without having to reconfigure the Site Plan itself. Mr. Valenzuela
reported his client is fine with the right-out only driveway and agrees that
when Avondale Blvd. is widened and the deceleration lane comes in, they will need
full access movement at the northeast exit.
Council Member Wolf
asked how could the Staff best address the color issue. Andrew McGuire, City Attorney,
replied if the applicant is willing to state tonight that they are comfortable
with adding more color as part of the approval without adding another
stipulation, that would be a strong statement.
Mr. Valenzuela
interjected that they could stipulate the color scheme when they go through
design review and plat.
Council Member Wolf
asked if Staff is okay with that, which Staff affirmed.
Vice Mayor Weise
suggested that the applicant be provided with the color palette for Agua Fria Marketplace.
Council Member
Wolf moved to approve Avondale Marketplace (DR-07-8) Master Site Plan and
Parcel 2 Final Site Plan with the 21 stipulations, to include the amended Stipulation
No. 15 as presented by Staff this evening. Vice Mayor Weise seconded the
motion.
The stipulations
are as follows:
1) The
development shall conform to the project narrative, site plan, landscape plan,
building elevations, preliminary grading and drainage plan, photometric plan,
materials and color board, and comprehensive sign package stamped February 8,
2008, except as modified by these stipulations.
2) In accordance
with Section 106.C.4 of the City of Avondale Zoning Ordinance, the Master Site
Plan and Parcel 2 Final Site Plan shall expire within one year of approval if a
building permit has not been issued.
3) The proposed
development is to conform to the Avondale Commercial/ Industrial/Multi-Family
Design Manual.
4) Architecture,
color and materials palette for future phase development shall conform to the
architecture, color and materials palette of the Master Site Plan.
5) All signs
shall be a uniform color that is consistent with the approved Master Site Plan
color palette.
6) Right-of-way
for Avondale Blvd.: The 9’ roadway easement along Avondale Blvd. is to be 3’
back of sidewalk only along the right-turn-lane and will end as the sidewalk
angles back into the right-of-way.
7) Right-of-way
for McDowell: Additional right-of-way for the traffic signal facilities at the
median opening west of Avondale Blvd. may be required. This will be determined
by the City Traffic Department when final construction plans are submitted.
Details for the construction of the median will be developed during the review
of final construction plans.
8) The catch
basin for area OFF2 shall be an appropriate MAG detail for the 10’ curb opening
shown as being required, as the MAG 530-532 is for a maximum 8’ opening.
9) The
right-of-way is to be a minimum of 3’ behind back of sidewalk for street lights
and sign placement. Right turn lane into storage units will require additional
right-of-way to meet this requirement. The amount of additional right-of-way
will be determined at the time of Civil Improvement Plans submittal.
10) Prior to the
issuance of a building permit for the first phase of development, the developer
shall contribute the following cost contributions toward traffic signals: 50%
for 116th Avenue and McDowell Road, 16% for Avondale Blvd. and Palm
Lane, 18% for Avondale Blvd. and Encanto, and full costs of all modifications
to existing traffic signal and associated work at northwest corner of Avondale
Blvd. and McDowell Road.
11) Additional
right-of-way on the corners at the intersection of McDowell Road and 116th Avenue is required for the new traffic signal equipment. The amount of
additional right-of-way will be determined at the time of Civil Improvement
Plans submittal.
12) During the
first phase of construction, the developer shall provide a transit stop,
including bus pull-out bay (can be co-located in deceleration lane if meets
spacing standards) and concrete pad for westbound traffic on McDowell Road west of Avondale Blvd. The developer shall also provide a transit stop
consisting of a concrete pad (no pull-out bay needed) for westbound traffic on McDowell Road west of 117th Avenue. Additional right-of-way will be required to
accommodate the transit bays and pads. The amount of additional right-of-way
will be determined at the time of Civil Improvement Plans submittal.
13) All water
rights on the property shall be conveyed to the City of Avondale prior to
recordation of the final plat.
14) No signs
shall be located in a public utility easement.
15) The
Developer will submit a revised traffic study for review and approval that
evaluates the impacts of establishing a right-out only driveway at the
northeast most corner of the property. The Developer will pay for the future
cost of the deceleration lane at the time of approval of the off-site
construction permits. When Avondale Boulevard is modified and the deceleration
lane is available, the northeast exit can be modified to be a full access
driveway.
16) Left and
right turn lanes, including dual turn lanes, for all driveways and
intersections shall meet the requirements of the traffic study for storage
lengths, stacking, and taper lengths. Some adjustments may be required at
Civil Improvements Plan submittal, such as to medians and openings.
17) The future
pads of Parcel 2 shall be treated with a decomposed granite ground cover for
dust control until development of those areas occurs.
18) All off-site
improvements will be constructed as part of the first phase of development,
including those for the residential Parcel 1 off of Palm Lane.
19) A signing
and striping plan will be required at Civil Improvement Plans submittal.
20) Pedestrian
access to Parcel 2 from the future residential part of the development plan
will not be allowed until the residential portion is developed.
21) The Master
Site Plan and the Final Site Plan for Parcel 2 shall be revised to describe the
Parcel 4 proposed use as Office Park.
Mayor Lopez
Rogers invited further discussion, and hearing none, called for a vote.
ROLL CALL VOTE
AS FOLLOWS:
Council
Member Scott Aye
Council
Member Buster Aye
Mayor
Lopez-Rogers Aye
Vice
Mayor Weise Aye
Council
Member Wolf Aye
Council
Member Karlin Aye
Council
Member McDonald Aye
Motion carried
unanimously.
9) AVONDALE COMMERCE CENTER PHASE III SITE PLAN
Scott Wilken, Senior Planner, stated this item is
application DR-07-29, Site Plan approval for Avondale Commerce Center Phase
III. He stated the subject property is located at the northwest corner of El Mirage Road and Van Buren Street and is part of the Avondale Commerce Center Planned Area
Development (PAD). Mr. Wilken stated tonight’s discussion is on Phase III of
the development. The surrounding zoning is R1-6 to the south, Agricultural to
the east and west, and the rest of the Avondale Commerce Center PAD to the
north. He described the subject property as currently vacant. Phase 1 is the
northern third of this property adjacent to I-10 and is complete, and Phase II
is nearing completion. The property to the west is undeveloped, while the
property to the east is large lot Agricultural, as well as undeveloped
property. He relayed that the proposed development will include a
retail/restaurant shopping center of approximately 53,000 square feet, three one-story
office buildings totalling 53,000 square feet, 2 two-story office buildings
approximating 60,000 square feet each, and a future 62,433 pad will be
incorporated into the shopping center, which will be approved at a later date
administratively.
Mr. Wilken described two right-in/right-out driveways from Van Buren Street. Both the intersections at 127th Avenue at Van Buren Street,
and El Mirage Road at Van Buren Street, are or will be signalized. Vehicular
access will be provided from two full access driveways from 127th
Avenue; two full access driveways from Corporate Drive; and two full access
driveways from El Mirage Road. Landscaping will be provided around the
perimeter and throughout the development that meets or exceeds the requirements
of the Zoning Ordinance and includes open space areas, shallow retention
basins, shaded pedestrian walkways, and outdoor plazas. The retail/restaurant
buildings include masonry exterior walls with painted stucco and stone veneer,
and clay roof tiles on overhangs and tower features. The one-story office
buildings include masonry construction with stucco and stone veneer finish, as
well as clay roof tiles and ornamental steel on the exterior. The two-story
office buildings will include painted concrete tilt panel walls which reveal
ornamental steel accents and a canopy system, stone veneer columns, and exterior
benches for outdoor seating. The front of the two-story office buildings will
include a balcony above the main entrance with rot iron guard rails.
Mr. Wilken reported that on February 21, 2008, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to forward a recommendation of approval to the
Council subject to 11 stipulations. He stated that he and the applicant are
available for questions.
Council Member Wolf commented that he likes the material
and the architecture, but would like to find a way to work some color into the
project.
Vice Mayor Weise stated he would like to punch up the color
and have it match the Coldwater Development across the street. Mr. Wilken
asked if he was talking about the greens and darker reds. Vice Mayor Weise confirmed
that and he would like the applicant to work with Staff on that.
Council Member Buster stated it was early enough in the
project to not go with Avondale beige, as long as it would not clash.
Mayor Lopez Rogers invited further questions for Staff, and
hearing none, invited the applicant to address the Council.
Kristin Thoma, RDB Management and Construction, 1617 W. Williams Dr., Phoenix, AZ, stated they look forward to completing the final phase of
the Avondale Commerce Center and are more than willing to work with Staff to brighten
up the colors.
Mayor Lopez Rogers invited questions for the applicant, and
hearing none, thanked the applicant. Mayor Lopez Rogers called for a motion.
Council Member Wolf moved to approve to Avondale Commerce Center
Phase III Site Plan application subject to the 11 stipulations. Council Member
Scott seconded the motion. Stipulations are as follows:
1) The development shall conform to the project narrative,
site plan, landscape plan, building elevations, preliminary grading and
drainage plan, photometric plan, materials and color board, and comprehensive
sign package stamped February 8, 2008, except as modified by these stipulations.
2) In accordance with Section 106.C.4 of the City of Avondale Zoning Ordinance, the site plan shall expire within one year of approval if a
building permit has not been issued.
3) Final site plan for the future pad at the southeast
corner of the site shall be reviewed and approved administratively, and shall
comply with the architectural theme, materials, and colors established by this
approval.
4) At the time of development of the future pad at the
southeast corner of the site, a site specific traffic study will be required,
including the analysis of queuing and stacking demand for any proposed
drive-through lanes and other traffic circulation issues.
5) Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for
the future pad at the southeast corner of the site, a pedestrian connection
will be required from the transit stop into site, and shall be shown on the
site plan. The connection will be required to be installed per City standards.
6) The future pad at the southeast corner of the site shall
be covered in decomposed granite a minimum of 2” thick for dust control at the
time of development of the retail/restaurant buildings.
7) Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the first
phase of development, the developer shall contribute payment for all costs
associated with installing and implementing left-turn arrows for north and
southbound El Mirage Road at the existing Van Buren Street intersection.
8) Civil Improvement Plans shall include and address the
following prior to the issuance of a building permit: a) Include ramps at all
intersection corners per ADA requirements and City Standards. b) Include right
turn deceleration lanes at both driveways on Van Buren Street as per the
results of the traffic study, including a minimum of 100 feet of storage and
100 feet of taper lengths. c) Design driveway connections to Van Buren Street as right-in/right-out only with raised pork chop islands designed per City
standards. d) Submit Signing and Striping Plans for both on-site traffic
control, and off-site signing & striping changes as per the results of the
traffic study, including, but not limited to: i. Stop signs at non-signalized
intersections and re-striping of turn lanes as needed. ii. Traffic control at
the internal 3-way intersection southwest of the corner of “single story
Building A office condo” where one approach intersects at an odd angle. All
legs are required to have STOP signs, Stop bars, and 50-feet of double yellow
striping on approach. iii. Re-striping to extend the left turn storage bay on
El Mirage Road for southbound traffic at Van Buren Street to a minimum of 225
feet of storage. iv. For the intersection at El Mirage Road & Corporate
Drive, re-striping dedicated left turn lane in the northbound and eastbound
directions with a minimum of 150 feet of storage. Two-way left turn lane
should not approach Stop-controlled intersection condition. e) Include a
transit stop, including bus pull-out bay and landing pad, for westbound traffic
on Van Buren Street west of El Mirage Road. f) Include fire lines for
individual buildings, as well as domestic water lines to 5’ outside of
buildings, water meters, and back flow prevention devices. For domestic
services, the meters shall be kept in right-of-way at back of sidewalk and back
flow prevention devices just outside of public utility easement on property
owner’s side. g) Conduct a vertical review of the sewer alignment to ensure
sufficient cover over the sewer line.
9) Prior to the issuance of a building permit for either of
the two-story office buildings, the developer shall contribute ¼ of the cost of
traffic signal at the intersection of 127th Avenue and Van Buren Street.
10) Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for
either of the two-story office buildings, the developer shall widen Van Buren
Street for an eastbound left turn lane at 127th Avenue with a
minimum of 200 feet of storage, as per the results of the traffic study.
11) Because the traffic study reviewed only general office
and commercial retail land uses, an updated traffic study is required for any
other land uses proposed for this development.
Mayor Lopez Rogers invited further discussion, and hearing
none, called for a vote.
ROLL CALL VOTE
AS FOLLOWS:
Council
Member Scott Aye
Council
Member Buster Aye
Mayor
Lopez-Rogers Aye
Vice
Mayor Weise Aye
Council
Member Wolf Aye
Council
Member Karlin Aye
Council
Member McDonald Aye
Motion carried
unanimously.
10) PUBLIC
HEARING AND ORDINANCE 1295-308 – FOR Z-07-3 – ZAVALA LIVING TRUST
John Vater, Planner I, Development Services Department,
stated item Z-07-3 is a request for rezoning from Residential (R1-6) to
Community Commercial (C2), and the site is located at 11215 W. Buckeye Road
between the intersections of 113th Avenue and 111th Avenue.
He stated the site is designated as Commercial in the General Plan. The
subject property is zoned Residential (R1-6), and the properties to the west,
south and east are zoned R1-6 as well, while the property to the north is the
Union Pacific right-of-way. Mr. Vater reported that Staff finds that the
application meets the required findings, and on February 21, 2008 the Planning Commission recommended approval of application Z-07-3 with one stipulation.
Mr. Vater stated he was available for questions, and the applicant was present
to take questions as well.
Vice Mayor Weise stated he wants to make sure that the
applicant understands that there is a Conditional Use Permit process for him to
do what he wants, to include the self-service car wash and repair facility.
Mr. Vater assured the Council that the applicant has had a pre-application with
Staff for the Conditional Use Permit.
Mayor Lopez Rogers invited further questions and comments
for Staff, and hearing none, opened the item for public hearing.
Roberto Garcia, 1223 S. 111th Dr., Cashion, AZ, stated he has been a resident of Cashion for 45 years. He relayed that he
spoke before the Planning Commission on February 21, 2008, and from what he saw, the Planning Commission did not have a copy of the Cashion District Ordinance Draft.
He reported that since the year 2002, several individuals and members of the Avondale
Development Services Department have attended meetings where the Cashion Business
District was created. According to the development of an amended Section 3, Commercial
District, relating to the creation of the Cashion Business District, all were
made aware and it was stipulated that it was not permitted to apply for a
permit to open a tire shop, mechanic shop, body shop or any other business, as
it states “not expressly as stated herein is prohibited,” page 2 of 8, Cashion
Business District Draft Ordinance. Mr. Garcia stated it was for that reason
that he never applied for a rezoning or requested a permit to set up a tire and
mechanic facility, which he thought was the easiest and most affordable
business he could endeavor to pursue. He and a neighbor have now lost six to seven years of precious time and now they find out that Mr. Damian Zavala is being given
permission to establish a diagnostic mechanic facility. Mr. Garcia stated that
represents some discrepancy in the planning and rezoning since the government
requests input from its community members in all phases of development,
planning and any other problems affecting the community at large. The Cashion
Business District meeting attendees thought that the whole area encompasses the
owners of property along Buckeye Road, and that they could rezone the area
altogether as a single request at a lower price. Yet it appears that nothing
was accomplished through the efforts they made in attending the planning and
drafting of the Cashion Business District Ordinance. Mr. Garcia requested that
he and the additional property owners along the Buckeye Road frontage be
allowed to pursue a rezoning from R1-6 to C-2 at a lower cost, or if possible obtain
a waiver, seeing that the Development Services Department of the City of
Avondale has made them waste six to seven years of their precious time, and in
light that they have been paying property taxes without any benefit of owning
those properties. If no rezoning or business permit is granted, he will have
to build a residential home next to the diagnostic facility.
Andrew McGuire, City Attorney, stated that Mr. Garcia’s
reading of the Draft Ordinance is correct, and that the current ordinance would
allow the car wash facility by a Conditional Use Permit, but what is not listed
as a permitted use is a repair facility. He stated that Mr. Garcia and others
can come back and ask for a rezoning of a particular piece of property to a
different category at any time.
Mayor Lopez Rogers asked Staff to work with Mr. Garcia.
Council Member Wolf commented that from August 19, 2002,
the Cashion Business District was first discussed, and Section 307, Permitted
Uses, gives a litany of uses, and then Uses Permitted Subject to a Conditional
Use Permit also applies to a car wash, mechanical or self-serve, technical schools,
etc.
Mr. Garcia stated now he has to build a home next to a
diagnostic facility and wonders if he will get permission for that.
Council Member Wolf stated that as cities continue to
mature and develop, and as they move through election cycles and Councils
change, the direction of policies change. He echoed Mr. McGuire’s comments, that
if Mr. Garcia is interested in rezoning, he should pursue it and the Council
will hear it in light of the same type of deliberations that have been taken
for Mr. Zavala’s property. He apologized to Mr. Garcia for the time it has
taken, and suggested that down the road the City would have an opportunity to
do something that will work even better for him. He added that an important
point to keep in mind is that tonight’s discussion is about enabling the
ability to provide a Conditional Use Permit for these uses.
Mr. Garcia asked if he would be able to build a residential
home there. Council Member Wolf stated that Council would have to look at the conditions,
and the Staff can look at that issue as well.
Mayor Lopez Rogers asked Brian Berndt, Development Services
Director, to contact Mr. Garcia. She informed Mr. Garcia that Mr. Zavala would
have to come back to Council for a Conditional Use, so there would be other
opportunities at that point as well. She thanked Mr. Garcia for coming before
the Council.
Mayor Lopez Rogers closed the public hearing. She invited
further questions and comments, and hearing none, asked to have the ordinance
read.
Andrew McGuire, City Attorney, read Ordinance 1295-308, by
title only. Council Member Wolf moved to approve the zoning ordinance. Vice
Mayor Weise seconded the motion. 1) A 20 foot “Future Roadway Easement” shall
be recorded on the northern portion of the site prior to issuance of any
building permit.
Mayor Lopez Rogers invited further discussion, and hearing
none, called for a vote.
ROLL CALL VOTE
AS FOLLOWS:
Council
Member Scott Nay
Council
Member Buster Aye
Mayor
Lopez-Rogers Aye
Vice
Mayor Weise Aye
Council
Member Wolf Aye
Council
Member Karlin Aye
Council
Member McDonald Aye
Motion passed 6
Ayes 1 Nay
11) PUBLIC
HEARING AND ORDINANCE 1296-308 REZONE FROM AGRICULTURAL (AG) TO PLANNED AREA
DEVELOPMENT (PAD) FOR DIAMOND P RANCH (Z-07-4)
12) PRELIMINARY
PLAT APPROVAL FOR DIAMOND P RANCH (PP-07-2)
Charlie McClendon, City Manager, stated items 11 and 12 would be presented together by Eric
Morgan.
Eric Morgan, Planner II, Development Services, gave a joint
presentation on Item Z-07-4, a request for rezoning of approximately 245 acres
from Agricultural (AG) to Planned Area Development (PAD), and also on Item
PP-07-2, a request for approval of a Preliminary Plat. He stated the subject
property of approximately 245 acres is located south and west of the southwest
corner of Avondale Blvd. and Lower Buckeye Road. He described two land use
designations, Low Density Residential along Lower Buckeye Road with a
development density of 1 to 2.5 du/ac, with a target density of 1 du/ac, and
the remainder of the site is Medium Density Residential with a density of 2.5
to 4 du/ac, with a target density of 2.5 du/ac. He informed the Council that
the applicant is proposing a development with a density of 2.4 du/ac. Mr.
Morgan stated the subject property is bounded on the west, north and east by
properties inside the City limits which are PAD zoned and are residential in
nature, and the subject property further south is within the County and zoned
Agriculture. The site is currently occupied by Pylman Dairy. East of this
site is Fleming Farms, which is moving through the final platting and landscaping
processes. North of this site is Del Rio Ranch, which is currently under
construction, as is Cantada Ranch to the west of the subject site. South of
the site is vacant farm land, and to the southwest is a substation. Mr. Morgan
stated that the PAD narrative gives stipulations and direction on lot
dimensions, setbacks, coverage, etc.
Mr. Morgan described the streets and circulation, stating the
northern part of 117th Avenue is part of Fleming Farms’ approval,
and the applicant is proposing to build two collector streets, Elwood Street and 119th Avenue. The applicant has proposed 42 lots at 105 X 200
feet along the north, 169 lots at 73 X 120, and 211 lots at 68 X 115, as well
as 167 lots at 63 X 110. In total there will be 589 total lots at 2.4 du/ac. He
stated he would like the Council to notice that these lots are spread out throughout
the development. The average lot size provided will be 71 X 121 with an
average area of 7,429 square feet. It is anticipated that on Lower Buckeye, Avondale Blvd. and Elwood Street will be traffic signals. Mr. Morgan informed the Council
that the development standards for the side and rear setbacks comply with the
Zoning Ordinance, which is a minimum of 8, and a combined total of 18, except
for the largest sized lot, which would be a minimum of 15 with a combined side
yard total of 30. The PAD narrative does propose different front setbacks and
what it does allow is a reduced setback for side entry garages and small casita
areas that are attached to the main dwelling, which will provide variation and
visual interest along the street scape. The PAD narrative also proposes a
slight increase in lot coverages, for the largest lots from 20 to 30%, and a 5%
increase for the 73 and 68 foot wide lots, and a 40 to 50% increase for the
smallest lots. All other development standards comply with the Zoning
Ordinance.
Mr. Morgan pointed out that the applicant has worked with
the Little Elementary School District with regard to a site of approximately
18.67 acres. The PAD allows for this to be a school or to be developed as townhomes.
He pointed out that if the site is developed as townhomes, there are
development standards that the townhomes must be 2-3 stories, provide two-car
garages, and there can be no more than 130 units at 7 du/ac density. He
reported that part of the stipulations approved by the Planning Commission is a
change of the PAD narrative, in that if the site would be developed as townhomes,
it would have to come back through the Planning Commission and the Council for
amendment of the Preliminary or the Final Plat. He noted the applicant has
been required to provide a minimum of 10% active open space (25 acres), and the
applicant is providing 36 acres of active open space, approximately 15% of the
site. The total active and passive open space totals 50 acres or 20% of the
site. The active open space is proposed as a 6 acre community park with
volleyball courts, trails, ramadas, shade structures, etc., and three pocket
parks with basketball and volleyball structures, as well as barbecues, shade structures
and tot lots. The multi-use trail is two-thirds of a mile and travels
east-west along the middle of the site, and then north-south along the western
edge of the site and connects Avondale Blvd. with Lower Buckeye, and then continues
on to the north through Del Rio Ranch. The stabilized trail proposed will have
landscaping, shade trees, benches, trash receptacles, and pedestrian scale
lighting through the entire length. One stipulation proposed by Staff is that
any areas not specifically improved for the multi-use trail would still get
treatment with decomposed granite for dust control and landscaping for
aesthetics. Mr. Morgan showed the Council slides of the entry signage, walls
and fence elevations.
Regarding phasing, Phase 1 consists of 206 lots, and the
applicant proposes to construct Elwood Drive and 119th Avenue. Staff
is proposing a stipulation that offsite improvements be included in the first
phase. Phase 2 is 58 lots and includes the community park. The school/townhome
site would be required to be covered with decomposed granite for dust control
if it remains undeveloped at that time. Phase 3 is 186 lots, and Phase 4 is
139 lots.
Mr. Morgan informed the Council that Staff and the Planning
Commission found the PAD ordinance met the two required findings of the Zoning
Ordinance, and that the proposed Preliminary Plat complies with the proposed
PAD Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and the Subdivision Regulations. On February 21, 2008, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval to
rezone from AG to PAD with 8 stipulations, and approval of the Preliminary Plat
with 10 stipulations. Additional stipulations were later added stating “The
developer of Diamond P Ranch shall relocate the existing high voltage power
pole located in the northwest corner of Elwood Street and Avondale Blvd. to outside
of the proposed right-of-way,” and “All areas within the power line easements
not a part of the multi-use train system shall be covered with DG and provided
landscaping,” and “All perimeter off-site improvements shall be completed with
the first phase of development.” Mr. Morgan stated Staff and the applicant
were present to answer questions.
Mayor Lopez Rogers invited questions for Staff, and hearing
none, invited the developer to come forward.
Mike Curley, 3101 N. Central Ave., Phoenix, AZ, invited questions.
Council Member Karlin asked if it was correct that the land
was not donated to the school district, but the property is provided if the
school wants to build there. Mr. Curley replied that is correct, they are
reserving the site and they want the school to be there, and they are willing
to go into a Development Agreement with the school district to make contributions
to the school. Council Member Karlin stated in Garden Lakes the developer
donated the land to the schools, and commented there is overcrowding in the
schools and there are not enough schools being built, primarily because there
is not enough funding and a concern with purchase of the land. She asked what
would prohibit the applicant from donating land for the school. Mr. Curley
replied they do not know for certain that the school district will locate the
school on their site, so at this point a donation is not in the cards, but they
are willing to assist them through a developer contribution agreement.
Council Member Wolf stated that Littleton Elementary has a
school on the other side of this development, and he does not know if a location
of the school on this site is as much driven by the development as it is a
potential relocation of the school that is on Avondale Blvd. He stated he is
in favor of the City working with Littleton School District regarding what happens
with Littleton Elementary on Avondale Blvd. and Buckeye Road because he sees an
opportunity to make this land available for relocation of the school and to
provide the property on Avondale Blvd. and Buckeye Road for another use, as it is
potentially very dangerous.
Charlie McClendon, City Manager,
stated he has personally talked with Littleton Elementary representatives about
this on more than one occasion. He relayed that it is complicated by some of
the rules of the State School Facilities Board, which makes relocation of a
school almost impossible until they are finished building other schools. He stated
that Staff continues to offer their assistance if and when the school relocates
regarding the marketing and reuse of Littleton’s existing property.
Mayor Lopez Rogers asked would the applicant consider
leaving options open to a private or charter school site. Mr. Curley replied
there had been no discussion on that to his knowledge, so he could not speak to
it, but he presumes if a charter school came knocking at the door, the Pylmans
would certainly entertain that. Mayor Lopez Rogers asked that that option be considered
at some point.
Vice Mayor Weise complimented the developer on the larger
size lots he is proposing. He stated one of the complaints about graffiti was
on the Pylman property, and if they could do something about that, that would
be great. Mr. Curley responded that when they first met with Staff, one of the
first prerequisites that they gave was that the applicant incorporate the
larger lots, so it had been part of their planning decisions from day one.
Mayor Lopez Rogers invited further questions and comments,
and hearing none, opened the item for public hearing. There were no requests
to speak. Mayor Lopez Rogers closed the public hearing. Hearing no further
questions or comments, she asked to have the ordinance read.
Andrew McGuire, City Attorney, read Ordinance 1296-308.
Council Member Wolf moved to approve the ordinance. Council Member Scott
seconded the motion.
Mayor
Lopez Rogers invited further discussion.
Andrew
McGuire, City Attorney, reminded the Council that three additional stipulations
were added.
Council
Member Wolf amended his motion to include the three stipulations. Council
Member Scott seconded the motion. Stipulations are as follows:
1) Development shall be in substantial conformance with the
Development Plan and narrative Planning Division date stamped February 8, 2008.
2) Right-of-way shall be required as follows: a) Lower Buckeye Road – 55 feet width half-street. b) Avondale Boulevard – 65 feet width
half-street. c) 119th Avenue – 80 feet width full-street. d) 117th Avenue – 70 feet width full-street once the roadway transitions onto the
subject property from Fleming Farms PAD. e) Elwood Street – 80 width full
street. Additional requirements for improvements, traffic signals and
right-of-way for deceleration lanes, turn lanes, transit stops, etc., may be
required during the Site Plan process depending upon the findings of traffic
studies and analysis.
3) Cost contribution towards traffic signals are required
as follows: a) Lower Buckeye Road & 119th Avenue - 50% of the
cost to signalize the intersection. b) Avondale Boulevard & Elwood Street
- 25% of the cost to signalize the intersection. Additional traffic signals may
be required based upon the findings of traffic studies and analysis, and as
determined by the City Engineer.
4) Prior to recording of a final plat, the Developer
shall: a) Obtain ownership of the existing irrigation well ADWR Well
Registration No. 55-565981, and transfer that ownership to the City; b) Provide
a well site footprint of approximately 7,000 square feet, no more than 660 feet
from the location of the existing well, for purchase by the City; c) Provide
design and construction of a pressurized transmission line from the well site
to an existing transmission line at 119th Avenue and Lower Buckeye
Road for reimbursement by the City; and d) The City shall work with the
Developer to prepare a Purchase and Reimbursement Agreement to cover the well
site property and the transmission line costs.
5) Prior to recording of a final plat, the Developer shall
abandon per the Arizona Department of Water Resources’ (ADWR) well abandonment
rules any existing domestic and/or irrigation wells that will not be
transferred to the City. This includes, but is not limited to, ADWR Well
Registration Nos. 55-634912, 55-625282, and 55-625281.
6) Prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy,
extinguish and pledge all existing Grandfathered Irrigation Rights, in
conformance with Arizona Statutes, to the City’s assured Water Supply account
at the ADWR. This includes, but is not limited to, Rights Nos. 58-106098.0003
(75.2 acres), 58-106096.0004 (21.741 acres), 58-110594.0002 (50.0 acres), and
58-106096.0003 (371.88 acres).
7) A full traffic study shall be required at the time of
Master Site Plan or Preliminary Plat application. A site specific traffic
study shall be required for the proposed school/proposed Townhomes (R-2) site.
8) A Preliminary Plat shall be required for the single
family attached townhomes site prior to the development. The Preliminary Plat
shall require recommendation from the Planning Commission and approval by City
Council. The Preliminary Plat shall not be an administrative approval by
Staff.
9) The developer of Diamond P. Ranch shall relocate the
existing high voltage power pole located in the northwest corner of Elwood Street and Avondale Blvd. to outside of the proposed right-of-way.
10) All areas within the power line easements not a part of
the multi-use trail system shall be covered with DG and provided landscaping.
11) All perimeter off-site improvements shall be completed
with the first phase of development.
Mayor
Lopez Rogers invited further discussion, and hearing none, called for a vote.
ROLL CALL VOTE
AS FOLLOWS:
Council
Member Scott Aye
Council
Member Buster Aye
Mayor
Lopez-Rogers Aye
Vice
Mayor Weise Aye
Council
Member Wolf Aye
Council
Member Karlin Aye
Council
Member McDonald Aye
Motion carried
unanimously.
Mayor
Lopez Rogers asked for a motion on Item 12, the Preliminary Plat approval for
Diamond P Ranch (PP-07-2).
Council
Member Wolf moved to approve the Preliminary Plat subject to the stipulations
in the Staff Report and those discussed this evening. Vice Mayor Weise
seconded the motion.
1) Development
shall be in substantial conformance with the Development Plan and narrative
Planning Division date stamped February 8, 2008.
2) Prior to recording of a final plat, the Developer
shall: a) Obtain ownership of the existing irrigation well, ADWR Well
Registration No. 55-565981, and transfer that ownership to the City; b) Provide
a well site footprint of approximately 7,000 square feet, no more than 660 feet
from the location of the existing well, for purchase by the City; c) Provide
design and construction of a pressurized transmission line from the well site
to an existing transmission line at 119th Avenue and Lower Buckeye
Road, for reimbursement by the City; and d) The City shall work with the
Developer to prepare a Purchase and Reimbursement Agreement to cover the well
site property and the transmission line cost.
3) Prior to recording of a final plat, the Developer shall
abandon per the Arizona Department of Water Resources’ (ADWR) well abandonment
rules any existing domestic and/or irrigation wells that will not be
transferred to the City. This includes, but is not limited to, ADWR Well
Registration Nos. 55-634912, 55-625282, and 55-625281.
4) Prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy,
extinguish and pledge all existing Grandfathered Irrigation Rights, in
conformance with Arizona Statutes, to the City’s assured Water Supply account
at the ADWR. This includes, but is not limited to, Rights Nos. 58-106098.0003
(75.2 acres), 58-106096.0004 (21.741 acres), 58-110594.0002 (50.0 acres), and
58-106096.0003 (371.88 acres).
5) On the final
plat, Tract K Well Site shall abut directly upon 119th Avenue, thus
eliminating that section of Tract H directly abutting Tract K Well Site.
6) A
site-specific traffic study analysis for the school site will be required at
site plan or building permit application, whichever comes first. Amenities for
Safe Routes to School to be coordinated with Civil Infrastructure plans.
7) Improvements
required for the ¾ access opening (right-in/right-out/left-in only) at Odeum
Lane & Avondale Boulevard to be shown on the Civil Infrastructure plans.
8) Cost contribution towards traffic signals are required as
follows: a) Lower Buckeye Road & 119th Avenue - 50% of the cost
to signalize the intersection. b) Avondale Boulevard & Elwood Street - 25%
of the cost to signalize the intersection. c) Additional traffic signals may
be required based upon the findings of traffic studies and analysis, and as
determined by the City Engineer.
9) Signing and Striping Plan will be required at Civil
Improvement Plans submittal.
10)
The developer of Diamond P Ranch shall relocate the existing high voltage power
pole located in the northwest corner of Elwood Street and Avondale Blvd. to
outside the proposed right-of-way.
11)
All areas within the power line easements not a part of the multi-use trail
system shall be covered with DG and provided landscaping.
12)
All perimeter off-site improvements shall be completed with the first phase of
development.
Mayor
Lopez Rogers invited further discussion, and hearing none, called for a vote.
ROLL CALL VOTE
AS FOLLOWS:
Council
Member Scott Aye
Council
Member Buster Aye
Mayor
Lopez-Rogers Aye
Vice
Mayor Weise Aye
Council
Member Wolf Aye
Council
Member Karlin Aye
Council
Member McDonald Aye
Motion carried
unanimously.
13) PUBLIC
HEARING AND ORDINANCE 1294-308 REZONE FROM AGRICULTURAL (AG) TO PLANNED AREA
DEVELOPMENT (PAD) FOR AVONDALE COMMERCE PARK (Z-07-7)
Eric Morgan,
Planner II, Development Services, stated this is Item Z-07-7. The property is
currently zoned Agricultural and is within the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan
area. The subject property is bordered on the south by the City of Tolleson. The site is approximately 80 acres. Development is to the north, east and south,
and to the west is currently vacant, but development is expected. The
development standards in the proposed PAD establishes setbacks which comply
with the minimums of the Freeway Corridor Plan and Zoning Ordinance, and
addresses maximum building heights, which comply with the amended Freeway
Corridor Specific Plan, and adopts those performance criteria to obtain the
bonus height, which would allow up to six stories, 84 feet, for all uses except
stand-alone retail. The PAD also addresses open space and amenities and
complies with the minimums of the Freeway Corridor Plan and the Zoning
Ordinance, and provisions for pedestrian refuge areas. The PAD addresses landscaping,
which complies with the minimums of the Zoning Ordinance and Freeway Corridor
Plan, with additional stipulations for undulating perimeter walls for enhanced
visibility and attractiveness, as well as enhanced entryway corridors. The
signage complies with the maximums of the Zoning Ordinance.
Mr. Morgan
pointed out that the original PAD narrative proposed no phasing, but Staff
asked for a stipulation, which the Planning Commission approved, to meet the
Freeway Corridor Plan minimum phasing of 10 acres for a master development
plan. Mr. Morgan described the uses of PADs A and B as based upon the Commerce Park and A-1 General Industrial zoning districts, without any of the heavy uses or
conditional uses of the General Industrial district. PADs C and D correspond
to the Community-Commercial C-2 zoning district and are meant to provide
support to the employment areas of PADs A and B and other nearby developments
in the immediate vicinity.
Mr. Morgan
informed the Council that Staff and the Planning Commission found that the
request met the two required findings of Section 6 of the PAD Zoning Ordinance,
and on February 21, 2008, the Planning Commission recommended approval by a
vote of 5-1 with the eight stipulations proposed by Staff.
Mayor Lopez Rogers
invited questions and comments, and hearing none, opened the item for public
hearing. There were no requests to speak. Mayor Lopez Rogers closed the
public hearing and asked to have the ordinance read.
Andrew McGuire,
City Attorney, read Ordinance 1294-308, by title only. Council Member Wolf moved
to approve the ordinance as read. Vice Mayor Weise seconded the motion.
1) Development
shall be in substantial conformance with the Development Plan and narrative
Planning Division date stamped February 8, 2008.
2) Right-of-way
shall be dedicated to the City as required by the then-current version of the
City’s adopted transportation plan: For reference purposes only, as of the
date of this Ordinance, the required right-of-way dedications are as follows:
(This stipulation has been modified from the Planning Commission recommendation
by the City Attorney.) a) Van Buren Street – 65 feet half-street width. b)
Roosevelt Street – 50 feet half-street width. c) 101st Avenue – 40
feet half-street width. d) 103rd Avenue – 40 feet half-street width
transitioning into 80 feet full-street width as determined by the ultimate
street alignment. E) Pierce Street – 80 feet full-street width. Additional
requirements for improvements, traffic signals and right-of-way for
deceleration lanes, turn lanes, transit stops, may be required during the Site
Plan process depending upon the findings of the required traffic studies.
3) A
contribution of 25% of the cost of a traffic signal at 103rd Avenue
and Van Buren Street shall be required with approval of the Master Site Plan
for the first phase. Additional traffic signals may be required depending upon
the findings of traffic studies and analysis, as determined by the City
Engineer.
4) A 16” water
line is planned to go in Van Buren by a CIP job. This development will be
required to pay for the portion along their frontage with the first phase prior
to issuance of permits.
5) A 65-feet
width half-street waterline easement along the entire frontage of Van Buren Street is required for installation of a 16” waterline, water quality station and
meters. Said easement shall be granted and executed prior to recordation of a
Final Plat.
6) All
groundwater rights shall be dedicated to the City of Avondale in conformance
with Arizona Statutes prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy.
7) Master Site
Plans shall be a minimum of 10 acres. A minimum of twenty-five (25%) percent
of each Master Site Plan shall be developed in the first phase.
8) Development
shall conform to the Design Manuals as adopted by the City and maintained by
the Development Services Department.
Mayor Lopez
Rogers invited further discussion, and hearing none, called for a vote.
ROLL CALL VOTE
AS FOLLOWS:
Council
Member Scott Aye
Council
Member Buster Aye
Mayor
Lopez-Rogers Aye
Vice
Mayor Weise Aye
Council
Member Wolf Aye
Council
Member Karlin Aye
Council
Member McDonald Aye
Motion carried
unanimously.
14) ADJOURNMENT
There being no
further business to come before the Council, Council Member Wolf moved to
adjourn. Vice Mayor Weise seconded the motion. The motion carried
unanimously.
Meeting
adjourned at 9:50 p.m.
_____________________________
Mayor
Lopez-Rogers
_________________________________
Linda M. Farris, CMC
City Clerk
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the
foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the regular
meeting of the Council of the City of Avondale held on the 17th day
of March, 2008. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held
and that the quorum was present.
__________________________________
City Clerk
Any individual with a qualified
disability may request a reasonable accommodation by contacting the City Clerk
at 623-333-1200 at least 48 hours prior to the Council meeting.